Search Results for "marriage name change"

416 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 416 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash Matrimonial Cruelty and Dowry Case. Husband Challenges Criminal Proceedings Alleging Vague Allegations and Abuse of Process.

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending in C.C.No.19072/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SC/ST Act Charges Against Accused in Private Altercation — Insult Not in Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Occurred Inside a Shop, Not in Public View, Failing to Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Bhimappa Jantakal @ Bhimanna and three others, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Husband and In-laws in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Soon Before Death Harassment. Demand of Rs. 10 Lakhs Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt; Deceased's Illness and Treatment Records Suggest Natural Causes.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Sandeep Kumar and his parents under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code for dowry death. The d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree in Cruelty Case. Marriage Dissolved Under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on Grounds of Mental Cruelty and Desertion.

The appellant, Savithri, wife of S. Ravindra Reddy, filed an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act against the judgment and decree dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...