Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "maharashtra revenue tribunal"

1298 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1298 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Has No Power to Review Its Own Orders Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Tribunal's review jurisdiction under Section 315(1) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 is not available for orders passed under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

20 Oct 2006

The case involved a reference to a larger bench of the Bombay High Court to determine whether the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal has jurisdiction to rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revenue Tribunal's Order Automatically Vacating Stay in Land Dispute — Asian Resurfacing Principle Not Applicable to Revenue Tribunals Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The court held that the automatic vacation of interim stay after six months under Asian Resurfacing applies only to CPC and criminal proceedings, not to revenue tribunals under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

18 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Devsing Ramchandra Chavan, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 23 June 2021 passed by the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Price Fixation Case. The Court restored concurrent findings of lower authorities under Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, holding that the Tribunal exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence without establishing perversity.

6 Aug 2019

The case pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 6 July 1998 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlords' Petition in Tenancy Declaration Case — MRT Order Set Aside for Failure to Consider Relevant Evidence. The court held that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal must consider all relevant evidence, including the relationship between the parties and possession of other lands, before reversing a finding of the fact-finding authority under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

27 Sep 2005

The petitioners, Abdul Rajtak Abdul Rehman Mulla and Nurmohamed Abdul Rehman Mulla, are brothers and sons of the original landlord Abdul Rehman Mulla,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Dispute — Failure to Consider Material Evidence and Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. The court set aside the Tribunal's order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the Tribunal must consider all relevant evidence and provide reasons for its decision.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Digambar Samangaonkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Maharashtra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Revenue Dispute — Sets Aside Tribunal Order for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Consider Relevant Evidence and Provide Opportunity to Lead Evidence Constitutes Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

6 Aug 2010

The petitioners, legal representatives of the deceased Vaijnath Karpure, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Upholding State Minister’s Decision in Evacuee Property Mutation Dispute. Minister's Order Had Set Aside Lower Authorities' Orders Restoring Evacuee Property Entries.

13 Jul 2005

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from a dispute over evacuee properties in Lonavala. The original owner, Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu, migrated to Pak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal's Order in Tenancy Act Land Transfer Dispute. Petitioner failed to prove that respondent No.4 was not an agriculturist under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

2 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Nilesh Ravindra Varode, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Tenancy Dispute — Mutation Entry Deletion Upheld. The Court held that the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal erred in reversing the Sub Divisional Officer's order without considering the petitioners' ownership and the absence of tenancy rights.

13 Jul 2016

The petitioners, Purushottam Devidas Yogi and others, are the owners of field survey no. 35, admeasuring 4 Hectors 63 Ares, situated in Mouza Pokhari,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Temple Trust Against Tenancy Claim, Setting Aside Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order. Landlord-tenant dispute under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 — Court holds that the Tribunal erred in relying on revenue entries without considering the trust's ownership and the absence of evidence of tenancy on Tiller's day.

22 Nov 2019

The petitioner, Maroti Mahadeo Deosthan (a temple trust), filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 03/06/2016 passed by the Maha...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)