Search Results for "lost cheques"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes FIR in Money Laundering and Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Loan Transaction and Dishonour of Cheques Do Not Attract Sections 406, 420 IPC or Sections 5, 33(3), 42 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.

The present application was filed by the applicants (accused No.2 and another) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Arrest of Vessel in Cargo Damage Claim — Maritime Lien Not Established. Bill of Lading Claim Does Not Give Rise to Maritime Lien; Owner Not Liable Due to Demise Clause.

The case involves three appeals filed against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Admiralty Suit No.27 of 1999. The suit wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Complainant's Revision in Cheque Bouncing Case, Restores Order Issuing Process Against Accused. Sessions Court Erred in Holding Cheque Was Given as Security Without Trial.

The complainant, M/s Travel Force, a division of M/s Hede Consultancy Co. Ltd., filed a criminal complaint against Dr. Mohan N. Bhave under Section 13...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to prove legally enforceable debt not established.

This is an appeal by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when cheque and signature are admitted, shifting burden on accused to prove defence.

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Sukhalal Kumar, against the acquittal of the accused, Prakash B. Borkar, under Section 1...