Search Results for "liquor consumption"

182 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Subsidy for Grain Alcohol Production Under GR Dated 08.06.2007. Petitioner Seeks Direction to Grant Special Subsidy/Incentive of Rs. 10 Per Bulk Litre and Quashing of Rejection Order Dated 24.11.2021.

The present writ petition was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under its civil appellate jurisdiction by Karan Distilleries Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Clarifies Powers of Collector under Section 142 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Court Expands the Scope of "Any Place" in Section 142(1) to Include Multiple Licensed Shops in the Interest of Public Peace.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of the Collector's powers under Section 142(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Act Case for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Grant of Bail and Inadequate Material to Establish 'Habitual' Bootlegger

The petitioner, Kashinath Motiram Chavan, challenged a detention order dated 23 March 2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Duty on Captive Consumption — Industrial Consumers Not Entitled to Exemption Under Section 3(1)(b) of Goa Electricity Duty Act, 1985 as Self-Generated Electricity Not Supplied by Licensee or Generating Company.

The petitioners, a group of industrial companies and their directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder by Burning in Liquor Dispute — Dying Declarations Found Credible and Consistent. The court held that multiple dying declarations with consistent core version are sufficient for conviction under Section 302 IPC even without motive.

The appellant, Mariba Piraji Chapewad, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering Ganesh Suryawanshi by pouring kerosene on him and setting him...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close friend of deceased and his testimony was not corroborated by other evidence.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants for the murder of Mayur Damle under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and for assaul...