Search Results for "labour welfare"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "labour welfare"

737 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 737 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Computation of Minimum Wages. Labour Court erred in dismissing claim for difference in wages on ground of limitation and lack of adjudication of entitlement.

21 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Shri Tularam Manikrao Hadge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 29.07.2019 passed by the Labour Court, Nag...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award in Industrial Dispute — Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted to Workman. Termination of a workman without conducting a proper domestic enquiry and without providing opportunity to cross-examine management witnesses was held illegal and unjustified.

22 Sep 2022

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The first petition (WP No. 33097 of 2018) w...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Reinstatement and Regularisation of Daily-Wage Workers in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Illegal Termination. CGIT Award Directing Reinstatement with 30% Backwages and Regularisation Under Section 25F Not Interfered as Workers Completed 240 Days of Service and Termination Was in Violation of Statutory Provisions.

12 Dec 2025

The writ petition challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Mumbai, which had directed reinstatement and regularisation of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages for Workman in Private Unaided School Dispute. School's Challenge Dismissed as Termination Found Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

21 Dec 2023

The Petitioner, M/s. Navy Children School Secondary, a private unaided school established from the Welfare Fund of Defence Personnel, challenged the A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order for Reinstatement of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal. The court held that the burden to prove abandonment lies on the employer and that termination without notice or compensation under Section 25F is void.

20 Dec 2013

The judgment arises from two writ petitions: Writ Petition No.248 of 2011 filed by Kamala Mills Limited challenging the order of the 1st Labour Court,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Daily Wage Employees in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer's Failure to Produce Attendance Records Leads to Adverse Inference. The court held that non-production of attendance registers by the employer under Section 28 of MRTU and PULP Act warrants an adverse inference under Section 114(g) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, entitling employees to regularization.

23 Jan 2013

The appellants, Rama Atmaram Dahiwal and Mahadeo Karbhari Shinde, were daily wage employees of the Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (respondent). They f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Forum's Order in Favor of Construction Worker in Welfare Scheme Dispute. Token Contribution Under BOCW Act Constitutes Consideration, Making Worker a 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

27 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated an appeal concerning whether a construction worker registered under the Building and Other Construction Workers...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

12 Sep 2019

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Company's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Order Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act — Scope of Incidental Issues in Computation of Benefits. The court held that the Labour Court can decide incidental issues such as interpretation of settlements when computing benefits under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, as the workman's right to continuity of service had been established.

8 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Force Motors Ltd., challenged an order of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, which granted ce...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)