Search Results for "judicial integrity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "judicial integrity"

555 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 555 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Administrative Resolution on Judicial Promotions Under Haryana Superior Judicial Service Rules 2007. The Court Held That the High Court Could Prescribe Separate Minimum Marks in Written Test and Viva Voce Through Administrative Resolution Under Article 235 of the Constitution, as It Supplemented the Statutory Rules to Ensure Merit-Based Assessment.

13 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from a batch of appeals challenging a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court regarding the appointment of thirteen in-service...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

3 Mar 2023

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer Based on Overall Service Record and Adverse Entry. Single Censure Entry for Judicial Error Can Justify Compulsory Retirement Under Rule 56(C) of U.P. Fundamental Rules.

10 Dec 2019

The appellant, Ram Murti Yadav, a judicial officer of the rank of Additional District and Sessions Judge, challenged his compulsory retirement at the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Judicial Officer Convicted of Misconduct for Proximate Relationship with Lady Lawyer. Dismissal from Service Upheld as Gratification Includes Non-Monetary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services Rules.

16 Sep 2019

The appellant, a judicial officer appointed as Judicial Magistrate on 01.03.1985, was suspended on 08.02.2001 and dismissed from service on 15.01.2004...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary District Judge for Unsatisfactory Performance. Termination under Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 is valid and not stigmatic.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Rajendra Kadu, was appointed as a District Judge (direct recruitment) under the Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Review Committee Recommendation Without Considering Petitioner's Representations and Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing Held Invalid Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules 2008.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Avinash Vitthalrao Choudhary, a judicial officer appointed as Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate First Class on 14 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Lack of Integrity and Efficiency. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to prematurely retire a District Judge based on adverse entries and overall performance record.

22 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Ashokkumar Hiralal Lohiya, was a judicial officer who joined the judiciary as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in 1978 and was promoted ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Inadequate Disposal Record. Rule 10(4)(a)(i) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 applied to compulsorily retire an Additional District Judge based on consistently inadequate disposal and adverse remarks.

14 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Govind Laxmanrao Edke, was a judicial officer who entered service as a Civil Judge, Junior Division in June 1980, was promoted to Civi...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)