Search Results for "investment dispute"

1211 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1211 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute Between Parties Arbitration Petition Allowed Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Procedural Irregularities

The High Court allowed an arbitration petition challenging an arbitral award in a partnership dispute -- The Court found that the arbitral tribunal co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Azim Premji for Lack of Authority to File on Behalf of Company. Managing Director's Authority to Sue Required Board Resolution as per Articles of Association.

The suit was filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director R. Subramanian (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Deduction under Section 48(1) and Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 Allowed as Payments to Sisters and Nieces Were Cost of Acquisition and Investment in REC Bonds Was Valid.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of MVAT Provisions on Input Tax Credit Reversal for Capital Goods Sold as Scrap. Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 and Rule 58A of MVAT Rules, 2005 held intra vires the Constitution and not ultra vires the parent Act.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies challenging the constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — HDPE Powder Stock Not Unexplained Investment Under Section 69. Assessee's books of accounts showing purchases and closing stock were accepted, and nature and source of investment were duly explained.

The appeal was filed by the assessee, Babulal C. Borana, a dealer in HDPE plastic powder, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the d...