Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 2026...
Search Results for "invented word"
71 result(s) found
Found 71 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.
1 Mar 2021The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off in Pharmaceutical Product 'ONCO BCG' - Defendant's Mark 'BCG ONCO' Held Deceptively Similar Despite Common Descriptive Element 'BCG'.
14 Jun 2011The plaintiff, Serum Institute of India Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against Green Sign...
- 174
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.
6 Jan 2026The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
6 Nov 2025The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.
6 Apr 2026The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...
- 188
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Interlocutory Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'CHERI' vs 'MULTI CHERRY' — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Pending. The court declined to hear the ad-interim application due to procedural bars: the Appeal Court's order in the Clause XIV leave appeal and the Defendants' application for a preliminary issue on jurisdiction under Section 9A CPC.
24 Jun 2015The Plaintiffs, Indchemie Health Specialties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off Injunction in Pharmaceutical Trademark Dispute Due to Delay and Acquiescence. Similarity of marks alone insufficient for interim relief when defendant has used its registered mark for nearly a decade without evidence of confusion.
15 Mar 2017The plaintiff, Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Wockhardt Ltd and Overseas African Remedie...
- 76
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bayer's Challenge to Compulsory License for Nexavar Under Section 84 of Patents Act, 1970. Court Holds That Patentee's Import of Drug at High Price Does Not Satisfy Reasonable Requirements of Public or Constitute Working of Invention in India.
15 Jul 2014The petitioner, Bayer Corporation, a US-based pharmaceutical company, held a patent for the drug Sorafenib Tosylate, sold under the brand name Nexavar...
- 225
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Sun Pharma's Trademark Infringement Suit Against Sanofi's METOSAN, Finding No Deceptive Similarity with METOSARTAN. The marks are phonetically and visually distinct, and the products differ in composition, negating likelihood of confusion.
24 Oct 2016The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against The Madras Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Indi...
- 118
