Search Results for "individual workman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "individual workman"

228 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 228 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Award Holding Section 9A Notice Illegal for Unilateral Change in Vacation Leave Encashment Calculation. Management's change from 30-day divisor to 26-day divisor for computing daily wage for leave encashment held to be a change in service conditions requiring notice under Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

4 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Management of Bharat Earth Movers Ltd. (BEML), a Public Sector Undertaking, challenged the award dated 11.09.2013 passed by the Indust...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order Recognizing Protected Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Object to Union's Nominees Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Conciliation Officer Must Consider Employer's Objections and Pass Reasoned Order Under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

17 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited, is a registered company with a factory in Belur Industrial Area, Dharwad. Some of its employees are mem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Management's Appeal in Labour Dispute, Setting Aside Back Wages and Reinstatement Award Due to Workman's Non-Compliance. The Court held that the workman's failure to report for duty as directed by the High Court, despite offers of reinstatement, established disinterest in employment, warranting setting aside of the Labour Court's award under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

16 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a labour law case where the Management appealed against orders of the High Court and Labour Court. The Labour Court had awarded...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

21 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Finding That Employee is a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on the workman status under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 226/227.

4 Jan 2022

The petitioner, M/s. Taj SATS Air Catering, Goa Unit, challenged an order dated 25.10.2018 passed by the Industrial Tribunal and Labour Court, Goa, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Management's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Suspension and Deduction Upheld. Disciplinary action and voluntary deduction under settlement were valid, not constituting unfair labour practice under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

25 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Vivekanand Rugnalaya, Latur, a hospital management, challenged the judgment and order dated 13/11/2013 of the Industrial Court, Latur,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

11 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

18 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

12 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)