Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1704 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1704 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Other Witnesses Under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of POCSO Act, 2012.

The appellant, Sundaram, was convicted by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Krishnagiri, for offences under Section 5(l) r/w 6 of the POCSO Act and Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Factional Riot Murder Case — Acquittals Set Aside. Common Intention Under Section 149 IPC Applied to Convict All Members of Unlawful Assembly for Murder and Attempt to Murder.

The case arises from a violent incident on 13.06.2014 at Nava Borbhatha, Ankleshwar, where a group of accused persons, armed with deadly weapons, atta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not supported by medical evidence or eyewitnesses.

The appellant, Bhagwan Ramdas Tupe, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Vithabai Bajirao Patil by setting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as testimony of child witness was inconsistent with medical evidence and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Tukaram Rau Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of Yashodabai, and sentenced to life...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment arises from a criminal appeal against conviction for murder and related offences. The appellants, original accused Nos.1-3, 5, and 6, wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Uncorroborated Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC Set Aside as Sole Testimony of Son of Deceased Lacks Independent Corroboration and Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by the accused challenging their conviction under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Three Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307, 326, 427, 148 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant, Khawaja Iqbaluddin (PW1), alleged that on 25th September 2003, at around 8:30 p.m., while he w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Mischief by Fire Case Due to Material Contradictions and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 436 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dharam Kondiram Gumladu, was convicted under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for allegedl...