Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition No. 1326 of 2014 Involving Customs Matter. The Specific Outcome and Legal Principles Are Not Available from the Provided Text.
30 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "importers"
163 result(s) found
Found 163 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Seizure of Poppy Seeds Under NDPS Act — Poppy Seeds Not 'Opium' or 'Opium Derivative' Under Section 2(xvi) and 2(xvii) of NDPS Act, 1985. Poppy seeds are expressly excluded from the definition of 'poppy straw' under Section 2(xviiid) and are not covered by any definition under the NDPS Act, making their seizure illegal.
28 Aug 2019The petitioners, Chailbihari Trading Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition challenging the seizure of poppy seeds (khas-khas) by the...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Import Restriction for Areca Nuts — Condition Requiring NOC from FSSAI Held Ultra Vires. Import Policy Condition Violates Article 19(1)(g) and Article 14 of Constitution as It Lacks Statutory Authority and Is Disproportionate.
2 Apr 2019The petitioner, Siddhi Vinayak, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1913, engaged in the import of areca nuts (commonly kn...
- 126
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Valuation Dispute — Mandamus Issued to Assess Imported Scrap on Transaction Value. Court Holds That Declared Transaction Value Must Be Accepted Unless Proper Officer Follows Procedure Under Section 14 and Rule 12 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.
27 Mar 2019The appellants, Century Metal Recycling Pvt. Ltd. and Gauri Shankar Agarwala, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the pr...
- 313
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Commissioner of Customs in CHA Licence Cancellation Case — Failure to Verify Importer's Identity Under Regulation 14(d) of CHALR, 1984 Justifies Cancellation. The Court held that the CESTAT erred in setting aside the cancellation on the ground of leniency and that the CHA's obligation to verify the importer's identity is mandatory.
31 Oct 2018The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs (General), Mumbai, against an order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribuna...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Informer Seeking Balance Reward Under Customs Informers' Reward Scheme. Customs Department Directed to Pay Balance Reward Amount to Informer Who Provided Information Leading to Revenue Collection.
27 Apr 2015The petitioner, an informer of the Customs Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to release the balance amoun...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Port Trust for Refusing Remission of Demurrage Charges. Port Trust's Own Guidelines for Remission When Detention by Customs for Bonafide Operations Must Be Followed.
12 Apr 2010The petitioner, M/s. Rasiklal Kantilal & Co., a partnership firm engaged in import of goods including zinc ingots and copper wire bars, filed a writ p...
- 55
High Court
Bombay High Court Answers Reference Against Assessee in Sales Tax Case — Delivery Orders Not Documents of Title. Delivery orders issued by bankers against airways bills are not documents of title to goods and are not negotiable under section 2(4) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930.
22 Jul 2005The judgment involves multiple Sales Tax References under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, where the common question of law was whether delivery orders...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.
19 Apr 2005The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...
- 305
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Amendment of Plaint to Add Alternative Claim Despite Limitation Bar. All necessary facts already pleaded; interest of justice warranted amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
22 Jan 1957The dispute arose from a commercial transaction where the appellants, L. J. Leach and Company Ltd., filed a suit for damages against the respondents, ...
- 38
