Search Results for "illegal import"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "illegal import"

1014 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1014 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Goods in Trademark Dispute, Directs Customs to Not Withhold Clearance Based on Pending Civil Suit. Customs Authorities Cannot Refuse Clearance Solely Due to Private Trademark Dispute; Remedy Lies in Civil Court Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Jul 2023

The petitioners, UPS Sales and Suzhou Dake Machinery Company Ltd., imported goods under Bill of Lading No. EXSH2310608. The customs authorities (respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Restriction on Import of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanisms. Court Examines Whether Public Notice No. 109/89 Dated 21 March 1989 Renders Imports Under Pre-Issued Additional Licences Invalid.

13 Dec 2017

The petitioners, manufacturers of colour televisions, imported Video Tape Deck Mechanism (VTDM) and Colour Picture Tubes (CPTs) against additional lic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Recovery and Penalty on Import of MRI Machine. Court holds that benefit of exemption notification cannot be denied on ground that import licence was obtained prior to issuance of recommendation certificate, and that show cause notice issued after unreasonable delay is liable to be quashed.

7 Mar 2006

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shah Diagnostic Institute Private Limited and its director Dr. Viral Shah challenging orders...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Bearings in IPR Suspension Case — Mandamus Issued for Violation of IPR Rules 2007. Customs Authorities Suspended Clearance Without Confiscation Order or Notice Under Rule 7 of IPR Rules, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, NBU Bearings Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Recovery of Money Alleging Bank's Unauthorized Issuance of Demand Drafts from Cheque Mandate. The Appeal Involves Issues of Bank's Liability for Acting Contrary to Instructions Under Sections of Customs Act, 1962 and CPC.

22 Dec 2020

The plaintiff, a registered company engaged in manufacturing television and monitor components, imported goods and stored them in a bonded warehouse. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Import of Peas Under Restricted Category Based on Pre-Notification Contracts. Petitioners' goods cleared as contracts entered prior to amendment notification dated 29.03.2019 under Section 3 of Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.

15 Oct 2020

The petitioners, M/s. Harihar Collections and M/s. Raj Grow Impex LLP, are engaged in the import and export of agricultural commodities. They imported...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Fiscal Penalty and Debarment Orders in Import-Export Dispute — Failure to Fulfill Export Obligation Not Attributed to Petitioner's Fault. Appellate Authority's Orders Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Consider Petitioner's Contentions.

9 Mar 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Sudhir Diamonds, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

16 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order for Provisional Release of Seized iPhones. Ownership Dispute Precludes Release Under Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962.

8 Sep 2022

The Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai, appealed against an order dated 23 June 2022 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Circulars Denying SEZ Benefits to Trading Units — Circulars Held Ultra Vires Foreign Trade Policy. Court rules that Paragraph 6.11 of Foreign Trade Policy does not restrict SEZ benefits to only manufacturing units, and trading units are entitled to duty-free import of goods for re-export.

3 Aug 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Wipro GE Healthcare Private Limited, a trading unit operating within a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), filed writ petitions under Ar...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)