Search Results for "hafta"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "hafta"

30 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 30 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Detention Order in Habeas Corpus Petition for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards Under Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1985. Failure to Communicate Grounds of Detention in Language Known to Detenue Renders Detention Unlawful.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Dil Shad, wife of Huseen Kabeer, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Detenu's Bail Status and Inadequate Verification of In-camera Statements. The court held that the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction was vitiated as it did not consider the detenu's bail status and the in-camera statements were not properly verified, violating Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order passed on 26 April 2016 by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Criminal Cases Not Considered. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's bail status vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

18 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Viki Baban Galte, challenged a preventive detention order dated 26 April 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Verification of Incamera Statements. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Petitioner's Bail Status and Failed to Verify Incamera Statements.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jay @ Nunya Rajesh Bhosale, challenged a detention order dated 19.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. Preventive detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail application and did not adequately link the alleged activities to disturbance of public order.

11 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Rashid @ Jagga Shaukat Hussein Sayyed, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 September 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Vague In-Camera Statements — Failure to Furnish Dates and Places of Incidents Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation. The court held that withholding details of incidents in in-camera statements under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act renders the detention order illegal as it impairs the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Satish Shivcharan Samudre, challenged an order of detention dated 18th May 2013 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur under Sec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Vague In-Camera Statements — Failure to Furnish Date, Time, and Place of Incidents Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation. The Court held that withholding details of incidents beyond witness identity renders statements vague and infringes Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Satish Shivcharan Samudre, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleg...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of the complainant once the signature on the cheque is admitted, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, Krishna P. Morajkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, which set aside the convict...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Disposal of Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu's Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) Was Violated Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation.

13 Oct 2006

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Manoj Sansare, challenged the detention order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Bri...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)