Search Results for "haemorrhagic shock"

130 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 130 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Convict in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

The appellant, Shankar Maruti Bamne, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, for the murder of Ranganath Karande under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Son Who Axed Father to Death in Quarrel Over Idleness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Murder Based on Direct Eyewitness Testimony and Blood-Stained Clothes.

The appellant, Lahu Chandar Hilam, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his father, Chandar. The incident occurr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Brother-in-Law Attack Case. Life imprisonment confirmed for accused who entered deceased's house and inflicted fatal sword injury on neck.

The appellant, Krishna Chango Vavare, was convicted by the trial court under Section 302 (murder) and Section 452 (house trespass) of the Indian Penal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Brother's Murder in IPC Section 302 Case — Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence. Court finds no merit in appeal against conviction for murder of brother by iron rod assault.

The appellant, Hari Bhaktabahadur Thapa, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his brother, Govind alias Rajesh T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The appellant, Bandu Ramu Phadvale, was convicted by the Extra Joint Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of his cousin Vijay Chinta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Holi Festival Dispute Over Handcart. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for stabbing deceased with a knife following a quarrel over returning a handcart used to transport TV and VCR.

The appellant, Punawasi Jitlal Saroj, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of Vijay Singh under Section 302 IPC and se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Evaluates Appeal by Convicted Accused Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 324 IPC. The Trial Court Conviction Was Based on Eyewitness Testimony and the Fact That the Weapon Remained Embedded in the Deceased's Skull.

The accused Anil Bansi Alhat was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 254 of 2010 for offences under Section 302 (murder) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Intention. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Death Caused by Single Blow Without Premeditation, Offence Reduced to Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder.

The appellant, Deepak Namdeo Zate, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, for the murder of his wife Balabai under Section 302 IPC and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Witnesses Turned Hostile and Medical Evidence Did Not Support the Alleged Incident.

The appellant, Imtiyaz A. Rahiman Inamdar, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences punishable under Sections 302 and...