Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "gratuity scheme"

470 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 470 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Bank's Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Regional Rural Bank's Service Regulations Prevail Over Payment of Gratuity Act Ceiling. The Court held that the Vidarbha Gramin Bank Officers and Employees Service Regulations, 2013, framed under Section 30 of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, are a complete code for gratuity, and the ceiling under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 does not apply.

6 Jan 2020

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Vidarbha Konkan Gramin Bank, a Regional Rural Bank constituted under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Directing Payment of Gratuity Under Consent Terms — Contractual Obligation Binding Despite Statutory Ineligibility Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971. Consent terms in company petition under Sections 397 and 398 of Companies Act, 1956, requiring payment of gratuity to resigning director, enforced by CLB.

10 Jul 2015

The case arose from a company petition filed by Appellant No.2 before the Company Law Board (CLB) against Appellant No.1 and the Respondent under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Principal Employer Challenging Gratuity Liability for Contractor's Employees. Principal Employer Held Liable Under Section 7 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Gratuity of Contractor's Workmen When Contractor Fails to Pay.

5 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Cummins (I) Limited, an engineering company, challenged a common order dated 30 May 2003 passed by the Controlling Authority under the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Gratuity Award in Favour of Dismissed Employee for Fraudulent School Certificate. Forfeiture of Gratuity Upheld Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for Misconduct Involving Moral Turpitude.

10 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority (Assistant Commissioner, Labour, Chandrapur) dated 21.10.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MCGM's Writ Petition Against Gratuity Order Due to Procedural Irregularities. Controlling Authority's Ex Parte Order Set Aside as Corporation Was Not Given Proper Opportunity to Be Heard.

6 Aug 2018

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition challenging three orders: (1) an ex parte order of the controlling authority ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity and Leave Encashment to Resigned Government Employees — Distinguishes Resignation from Voluntary Retirement Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Maharashtra Civil Services Rules. Resignation after 10 years of service qualifies for gratuity under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and Rule 66(3) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1981 is invalid for denying leave encashment on resignation.

20 Jun 2014

The Bombay High Court, in a group of three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, considered the challenge by government emplo...

High Court

High Court of Madras Considers Interplay of Section 40A(7) and Section 43B for Deduction of Gratuity Provision. The Court Examined Whether Specific Provision Overrides Requirement of Actual Payment, but Final Verdict Not Available in Provided Excerpt.

24 Mar 2025

The case concerned an appeal by the assessee, a manufacturer of specialty chemicals, against the disallowance of a provision for gratuity of Rs.31,24,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Delayed Gratuity Under Section 8 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Employer's Dispute Over Quantum Does Not Justify Withholding Payment Beyond Prescribed Period.

20 Dec 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 27/02/2017 passed by the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Nagpur, acting ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Order, Holds That Disciplinary Proceedings Not Concluded Before Retirement Do Not Bar Gratuity Payment Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The Court upheld the Appellate Authority's order directing payment of gratuity to the employee as the disciplinary proceedings were not concluded prior to retirement.

8 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Canara Bank, challenged the order dated 22.12.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Writ Petitions Challenging CAT's Decision on Retirement Gratuity Effective Date. Employees Who Retired on 31.03.1995 Are Not Entitled to Revised Gratuity Scheme Effective from 01.04.1995 as Per O.M. Dated 14.07.1995.

29 Aug 2012

The case involved two writ petitions filed by the Union of India against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Mumbai Bench, which had ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)