Search Results for "gazetted officer"

283 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 283 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Non-Communication of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Dinesh Palyekar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Absorption of District Minority Welfare Officers Appointed Prior to Service Rules. Selection Process Indicates Regular Appointment, Not Deputation, Under UP Minority Welfare Department Gazetted Officers Service Rules 2001.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Raja Singh and others against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, which had dismissed their writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction for Possession of 85.810 kg Ganja Set Aside as Mandatory Search and Seizure Procedures Were Not Followed.

The appellants, Mobin Khan and Taslim Khan, were convicted by the learned District Judge-6 and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special (N.D.P.S.)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case for Possession of 2.225 kg Charas. Mandatory compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act not triggered as recovery was from bag, not person.

The appellant, Krishna S/o Kavi Raj Malla, was convicted by the Special Judge of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, for the offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Japanese National in NDPS Case for Possession of LSD and Charas — Procedural Lapses Not Fatal to Prosecution. The court held that Section 50 of NDPS Act does not apply to vehicle searches, and conscious possession was proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, a Japanese national, was convicted by the Special Judge of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Act Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Non-Production of Contraband. Benefit of Doubt Granted as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant was convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession of 6 kg 300 g of op...