Search Results for "futures trading"

47 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 47 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Claim for Share Trading Losses. Claimant Failed to Prove Respondent's Negligence or Breach of Contract, and Findings of Fact by Arbitrator Are Binding.

The appellant, Rajendra Kumar Bothra, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Legality of Arrests by Enforcement Directorate in Money Laundering Case After Predicate Offence Closed. Petitioners Allege Violation of Section 19 of PMLA and Fundamental Rights, Challenging Custody Remand Orders.

The three writ petitions, heard together, challenged the legality of the arrest and subsequent custody remand orders of the petitioners, who were dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Winding Up Petition Based on Alleged Debt Arising Out of F&O Trades; Respondent Disputes Liability and Raises Counter-Claim for Damages

This company petition sought winding up of Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd under the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground of inability to pay debts. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broking Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Contrary to Public Policy or Suffering from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Bombay Construction and Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice in NSEIL Dispute. Arbitrator Failed to Offer Hearing Despite Claim Exceeding Rs.25,000, Breaching Rule 5.10 of NSEIL Trading Regulations.

The petitioner, Milaan C. Jhaveri, challenged an arbitral award dated 20 April 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...