Search Results for "fresh cheque"

474 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 474 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Accused Due to Non-Existent Debt and Unrebutted Defence. Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Security for Loan Not Attracting Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Debt Not Legally Enforceable.

The petitioner, Sri Lalji Kesha Vaid, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused as Signature on Cheque Admitted and Statutory Notice Complied With.

The appellant, M/s. Indian Potash Limited, a company engaged in importing and marketing fertilizers, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negoti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Debt or Liability Must Be Legally Enforceable on the Date of Cheque Issuance Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, M. Shantilal & Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Discrepancy in Date of Knowledge of Dishonour — Notice Held to be Within Time as Complainant Received Information on 23rd May, 1997.

The appellant, Tarachand Paliwal (since deceased, represented by his legal heir Rupesh Paliwal), filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Complaint Against Director in Cheque Dishonour Case for Non-Joinder of Company. Prosecution under Section 138 NI Act cannot proceed without arraigning the company as an accused, and notice of demand must be served on the company.

The case involves a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by the respondent against the appellant, Himanshu, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Settlement Agreement Creates Fresh Liability, Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Not Rebutted.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, M/s. Cabral & Co. and its proprietor Francis Simon Cabral, against their convi...