Search Results for "foreign judgment enforcement"

756 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 756 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 50(1)(b) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Not Binding on Non-Signatory Respondents as They Were Not Parties to Arbitration Agreement.

The appellant, Integrated Sales Services Limited (ISSL), a Hong Kong company, entered into a Representation Agreement on 18th September 2000 with DMC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtors' Writ Petitions Challenging Attachment in Execution of Foreign Decree. Court Holds That Objections Under Order 21 Rule 58 CPC Must Be Raised Before Executing Court, Not by Writ Petition.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by judgment debtors challenging the attachment of their property in execution of a foreign decree. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory. Group of Companies Doctrine Not Applicable Without Evidence of Mutual Intention to Bind Non-Signatory Under Sections 47-49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a UAE company, filed an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and Section 50 of the Arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Holds That Objections to Enforceability Must Be Raised Under Section 48 and That Pendency of Civil Suit Does Not Bar Execution.

The case involves two special leave petitions filed by LMJ International Ltd. and Sri Munisuvrata Agri International Ltd. against Sleepwell Industries...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Foreign Court's Costs Order. Foreign judgment imposing costs is a decree enforceable under Section 44A of CPC, 1908, and the executing court cannot go behind the decree.

The Petitioner, M/s. Alcon Electronics Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 15th April, 2011 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Nashik, which rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Award Holder Against Award Debtor. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Non-Compliance, Incapacity, Natural Justice, and Public Policy.

The case concerns the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 17th January, 2011 passed in London, UK, in favor of Vitol S.A. (the award holder)...