Search Results for "foreign detention"

204 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act, Citing Lack of Consideration of Bail Conditions. Court Emphasizes Scrutiny of Detention Orders and Upholds Liberty in Preventive Detention Cases

Preventive Detention and Bail Conditions: The detaining authority must consider the efficacy of bail conditions imposed by the court before ordering ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Advisory Board Opinion in COFEPOSA Detention Case — Advisory Board's Opinion of No Sufficient Cause for Detention is Non-Justiciable and Not Subject to Challenge Under Article 136

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India against the opinion of the Advisory Board constituted under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider vital documents and exhibited casual approach.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Siraz Mohammed Sayyed, challenged a detention order dated 10 July 2015 passed under Sections 3(1)(ii) and 3(1)(i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Award in Favor of Petitioner in Arbitration Dispute. Court Holds That Award Does Not Violate Public Policy and Condoned Delay of 273 Days Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse S.A., a Swiss company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Sakuma Exports Limited, an I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...