Search Results for "fill lacunae"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting and Rent Default. Tenant's Claim of Assignment of Tenancy Rights Fails for Lack of Consent of Landlord and Non-Production of Evidence.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Ratnadeep Shankar Narkar (Applicant/Defendant No.2) challenging the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Criminal Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Deferment of Cross-Examination Under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. -- Accused in IPC Offences Including Section 302 Granted Relief to Prevent Prejudice in Defence Disclosure

The petitioners, accused in a sessions case involving grave offences under the IPC, sought deferment of cross-examination of witnesses under Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Further Investigation Order in Murder Case Due to Delay and Abuse of Process — High Court's Direction for Further Investigation Set Aside as It Was Sought After Trial Concluded and Earlier Section 311 Petition Was Dismissed.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the accused, K. Vadivel, challenging the judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dated 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 409, 420, 468, 471, 477-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Entrustment, Deception, or Forgery Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Damodar Kagane, was the original accused no.1 in Special Case No.2 of 1988 before the Learned Special Judge, Solapur. He was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Director's Evidence in Specific Performance Suit — Order 18 Rule 3A CPC Does Not Apply to Company Director. Director of Plaintiff-Company Can Be Examined After Constituted Attorney Without Prior Permission Under Order 18 Rule 3A CPC.

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance of a contract based on email exchanges, challenged the trial court's order allowing the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Trial Court's Order Allowing Additional Witnesses in Abduction and Murder Case. Section 311 CrPC Discretion Upheld as No Prejudice to Accused When Cross-Examination Opportunity Given.

The applicants, Kalpesh Ramnath Saroj @ Chhotu and Ravindrakumar Ramhatai Yadav, were accused in Sessions Case No.743 of 2012 pending before the Addit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against KSRTC Employee for Lack of Authority of Inquiry Officer. Inquiry Officer Appointed by Managing Director Without Delegated Power Under KSRTC (C&A) Regulations, 1971, Rendering Proceedings Void Ab Initio.

The petitioner, R.A. Nagendranath, a Chief Mechanical Engineer with KSRTC, challenged the legality of an order dated 14-1-2016 passed by the Managing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction by the Special Judge, Greater Bombay...