Search Results for "expropriatory legislation"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Appellant's Title and Possession Over Land Not Extinguished by Acquisition Proceedings. The court held that the appellant had locus standi to challenge the acquisition and that the delay was not fatal as possession continued.

The appellant, Sri V Sreenivasaiah, filed a writ appeal against the order dated 25.02.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. No. 2228/2022, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.19366 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for High-Speed Rail Project Due to Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioners, Not Being Recorded Titleholders, Cannot Challenge Acquisition Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013.

The petitioners, Dilip Babubhai Shah and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition proceedings initi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Copyright Injunction Against Music Streaming Service in Interpretation of Section 31D of Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that a statutory license under Section 31D for radio broadcasting does not extend to internet streaming services like Wynk Music.

The case involves two appeals by Wynk Ltd and Bharti Airtel Ltd (defendants) against an order of the Bombay High Court (SJ Kathawalla J) dated 23rd Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in lapse of proceedings.

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.

The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications for Tourism Project — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi as No Personal Right or Public Interest Established.

The petitioner, Arjun Mahadev Harmalkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Corrigendum for Non-Existent Road — Adding New Purpose Without Fresh Notification Invalid Under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Officer's Report Under Section 5A Recommending Dropping Acquisition Binding on Government.

The petitioners, Silvestre D' Souza and his wife Apolita D' Souza, purchased parts of a property in Santa Cruz, Goa, including a dwelling house. They ...