Search Results for "excise penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "excise penalty"

512 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 512 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds CESTAT's Remand Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Evasion of Duty Based on Undervaluation of Plywood/Block Boards. The Court Held That the Adjudicating Authority Must Provide a Reasoned Order After Proper Cross-Examination and Consideration of Evidence, and That the Tribunal's Remand for De Novo Adjudication Was Justified.

19 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise against orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) that...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

9 Dec 2019

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cenvat Credit Interest Dispute — Reversal Without Utilization Does Not Attract Interest. Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 interpreted to require actual utilization for interest liability.

25 Mar 2019

The appellant, Cipla Limited, a manufacturer of medicaments, was engaged in the manufacture of medicaments containing ethanol (alcohol) which fell out...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part — NCCD Payable Despite Excise Duty Exemption, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable. The Court held that Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, being surcharges on excise duty, cannot be levied when basic excise duty is exempted, but NCCD, being an independent duty of excise, is payable.

1 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (the appellant) and the Union of India regarding the liability to pay National Calamity Con...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Excise Duty Exemption Case — NCCD, Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Not Payable When Basic Excise Duty Exempted. Exemption Notification Under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944 Covers NCCD as Duty of Excise, and Surcharges on Excise Duty Cannot Be Levied Without Substratum.

1 Mar 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between Bajaj Auto Limited (appellant) and the Union of India (respondent) regarding the liability to pay National Cal...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Revenue's Appeal in MVAT Penalty Case — Section 61(2) Does Not Permit Reduction of Penalty Below Statutory Rate. The court held that once a penalty is imposed under Section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, the quantum must be exactly one tenth per cent of total sales, with no discretion to reduce.

15 Sep 2011

The Revenue appealed against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal reducing a penalty imposed under Section 61(2) of the Maharashtra Value ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)