Search Results for "excise duty deduction"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute. Customs duty under Section 150(2)(c) of Customs Act, 1962 has priority over warehouse charges under Section 150(2)(d) in distribution of sale proceeds of warehoused goods.

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (appellant) and M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd. (respondent) regarding the priority of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Awards in Service Tax Reimbursement Dispute. Court Holds That Construction of Contractual Clause by Arbitrator Falls Within Arbitral Domain and Is Not Open to Challenge Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves five appeals filed by Central Warehousing Corporation (the appellant) against a common judgment dated 18.02.2019 dismissing its arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Deduction Case Under Section 80HHC of Income Tax Act, 1961. CENVAT Credit Not Eligible for Deduction as It Is Not an Export Incentive Under Section 28(iiia)-(iiie).

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-III, Mumbai, appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 29 July 2011, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Assessee Engaged in Manufacture of Air-Conditioning Systems Entitled to Section 80IA Deduction. The process of designing, manufacturing ducting, and installing air-conditioning systems constitutes manufacture under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by M/s Koolnest Pvt. Ltd., the assessee, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that the as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Rejection of KVSS Declaration — Post-Manufacturing Expenses Dispute. The court held that an appeal is pending until the order is communicated to the party, and thus the declaration under Section 95 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 1998 was validly filed.

The petitioner, M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing aerated water, soft drinks, and fruit-pulp based drinks, was issu...