Search Results for "excessive payment"

574 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 574 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Arrears Case — Tenant Failed to Pay Rent Despite Notice Under Section 12(2) of Bombay Rent Act. Eviction Decree Confirmed as Tenant's Default Attracts Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 29(2) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (the Rent Act)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Application in Rent Dispute - Eviction Upheld Under Bombay Rent Act for Non-Payment of Arrears Before First Hearing Date

The High Court dismissed a revision application filed by the tenant challenging eviction orders passed under the Bombay Rent Act -- The landlord had p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Taxation Provisions: Section 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Act. Navigating the Boundaries of Legislative Delegation and Ensuring Equity in Taxation

Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17(2)(viii) and Rule 3(7)(i) - Constitutionality - Taxation of Fringe Benefits or Amenities - Essential Legislative Fu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Landlord's Appeal in Rent Dispute Under Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001. Tenant's Unilateral Reduction of Agreed Rent Constitutes Default Justifying Eviction.

The appellant, Harbans Kaur, is the landlord of Shop No.3 and 4 in Plot No.362, which was let out to the respondent-tenant, Iqbal Singh, in August 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...