Search Results for "excess salary recovery"

200 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 200 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Senior Bailiff in Service Matter Due to Departmental Error. Recovery of Excess Salary for 29-Year Period Set Aside as No Misrepresentation Shown, Causing Extreme Hardship Under Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, who was appointed as a Senior Bailiff in 1993, received an Official Memorandum dated 09.06.2022 from the 6th respondent stating that h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows State Appeal in Excess Salary Recovery Dispute; Sets Aside Interest Award in Retired Employee's Case. Recovery of Excess Salary Held Impermissible Absent Misrepresentation or Undertaking on the Eve of Retirement, Aligning with Principles Against Hardship.

The High Court of Madras adjudicated a writ appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu challenging a single judge's order that had directed refund of exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Against Recovery of Excess Pay from Steno-Typist. Recovery Set Aside on Grounds of Hardship as Employee Belonged to Group C Service, Excess Payment Exceeded Five Years, and No Misrepresentation Found, Following State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The dispute arose when the petitioner, K. Amutha, a Steno-Typist serving in the judicial department of the State of Tamil Nadu, was confronted with a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Partly Allows Railway's Petition in Pay Revision and Recovery Case — Recovery from Retired Employee Quashed as Unjust. Pay Revision Upheld but Recovery from Retiree After Ten Years of Erroneous Pay Fixation Held Impermissible.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Southern Railway, challenging an order of the Centr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Teacher's Petition Against Pay Reduction and Recovery Order — Recovery of Excess Payment Set Aside Due to No Misrepresentation. Pay Fixation Error by Employer Cannot Be Recovered from Employee Without Show Cause Notice.

The petitioner, Premchand Nathu Patil, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 16.06.1989 in a secondary school run by respondent No. 5 institute. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension and Recovery of Excess Payment. Employer's Order Reducing Pay Fixed at Retirement and Recovering Excess Amount Set Aside as Violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Unreasonable.

The petitioner, Vijay Sambrao Bharati, a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged an order of his employer that reduced the pay ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Post-Retirement Re-Fixation of Pay Without Notice. Re-fixation of pay after retirement without affording opportunity of hearing violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Naeem Ahmedkhan s/o Dilawarkhan, a retired government servant, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challe...