Search Results for "employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "employee"

7023 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7023 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Senior Sales Executive Challenging Termination — Holds He Is Not an 'Employee' Under MRTU & PULP Act. The court affirmed that the petitioner's supervisory and managerial role excluded him from the definition of employee under Section 3(5) of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

26 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Mr. Jobi Joseph, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 1 April 2014 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses ESI Corporation's Appeal, Upholds Dependants' Benefit to Widow of Deceased Worker. Daily Wage Rate Below Threshold Determines Employee Status Under Section 2(9) of ESI Act, Not Monthly Total.

13 Jan 2005

The case involves an appeal by the Regional Director of the Employees' State Insurance Corporation against an order of the ESI Court granting dependan...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions of Selected Driver Trainees Against NWKRTC, Holding They Are Not Workmen Under Industrial Disputes Act. Court Rules That Selected Candidates Undergoing Training Without Appointment Order or Remuneration Do Not Attain Status of Workman Under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Claim of Work-Charged Employee's Son - Permanent Employee Status Under Pension Rules Overrides Policy Exclusion. The court held that a work-charged employee who completed 15 years of service and became permanent under the Madhya Pradesh (Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees) Pension Rules, 1979 is not excluded from compassionate appointment under Clause 12.1 of the Policy dated 18.8.2008.

29 Sep 2020

The case involves a claim for compassionate appointment by the respondent, Amit Shrivas, son of late Shri Ranglal Shrivas, who worked as a Driver in t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal's Order Reinstating Part-Time Teacher in Retrenchment Case Under MEPS Act. Rule 26 of MEPS Rules Requires Compliance with Retrenchment Protections Including Notice, Seniority, Prior Approval, and Absorption.

5 May 2014

The petitioners, Nagpur Shikshan Mandal and Smt. Binzani Mahila Mahavidyalaya, challenged the judgment and order dated 14-8-2013 of the School Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employee as Nominee on Enquiry Committee Under MEPS Rules — Purposive Interpretation of Beneficial Legislation. The Court held that Rule 36(2)(b)(ii) of the MEPS Rules permits nomination of a retired/former employee to the Enquiry Committee, as the definition of 'employee' does not restrict to serving employees only.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Mangalsingh Amarsingh Rathod, was the Head Master of Mahatma Phule High School, Nimgaon, and was placed under suspension. A disciplina...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Appeal Under Employees' Compensation Act -- Temporary Driver Hiring Establishes Employer-Employee Relationship -- Labour Commissioner's Order Reversed

18 Feb 2026

The High Court allowed an appeal challenging the Labour Commissioner's rejection of a compensation claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Failed to Prove Termination Was Not Retaliatory. Oral Termination Without Notice or Justification Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Items (a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

7 Aug 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Val Colour Arts and its proprietor Mr. Valentine D'mello (employer), challenged the judgments of the First Labour Court, Mumbai, ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Management's Writ Petition Against School Tribunal Order in Employee Reinstatement Case. Termination Held Illegal Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981 Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 26 and Employee's Acquisition of Permanent Status After Probation.

9 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by an education society and its headmaster challenging an order of the School Tribunal, Solapur, which had ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

28 Feb 2006

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)