Search Results for "driver dismissal"

703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Amputation of Leg - Compensation Enhanced for Future Loss of Income and Pain and Suffering. Housewife's Notional Income Assessed at Rs.3,000 per Month with Multiplier of 16 for Permanent Disability.

The appellant, Gajaraben Rameshbhai Padhiyar (Parmar), filed a first appeal before the Gujarat High Court against the judgment and award dated 23.01.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence Established by Charge Sheet — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim Petition Despite Criminal Proceedings Showing Driver's Negligence Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Murugan T, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Bus Fire Caused by Negligence of KSRTC Driver. Claimant Entitled to Compensation as Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition on Grounds of Non-Joinder of Driver and Lack of Negligence Evidence.

The appellant/claimant, Smt. Chandra Prabha P., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for inj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows BMTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Motorcyclist. Liability Apportioned Equally Between BMTC and Deceased, Compensation Reduced to Rs.39,55,000/- with 6% Interest.

The appeal was filed by the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) challenging the judgment and award dated 17.09.2016 passed by the IX A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rash Driving Case — Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 338, 304-A IPC Upheld. Concurrent findings of fact by courts below not interfered with as no perversity or illegality found.

The petitioner, Athaulla, was convicted by the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Gudibande in C.C.No.16/2007 for offences under Sections 279, 337, 338 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Failed to Prove Driver's Lack of Valid License. Insurer liable to pay compensation as burden of proof under Section 149(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 not discharged.

The case arises from a fatal motor accident that occurred on 30.11.1999 on Pune-Jejuri road, resulting in the death of Vinayak Laxman Katake. The clai...