Search Results for "disorderly conduct"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim of Terminated LIC Employee in Fraud Case, But Denies Pay Revision. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4(6) Requires Termination Order for Forfeiture; Employee Not Entitled to Post-Termination Pay Benefits.

The petitioner, Shivaji Kerba Paikrao, was employed with the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) initially as an Assistant and later as a Higher...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination of Probationary Civil Judge. Termination of Probationer Without Hearing Held Permissible Under Rule 5(1) of Maharashtra Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1956.

The petitioner, Girish Satyanarayan Shukla, was appointed as a Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class on 23 October 1992 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Compensation Award in Industrial Dispute Over Illegal Strike and Misconduct. Dismissal of Workman Found Shockingly Disproportionate; Reinstatement Denied Due to Loss of Confidence.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an industrial dispute between workman Mahendra K. Raut and his employer M/s. Gopalanand Rasayan....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings for Misconduct. Court holds that findings of domestic enquiry are not perverse and punishment is proportionate.

The petitioner, TCE Consulting Engineers Ltd., challenged the order of the Industrial Court which set aside the dismissal of the first respondent, Dil...