Search Results for "discovery statement"

1331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Pronounces Oral Judgment in Cross Appeals Involving Kidnapping, Murder, and Conspiracy Under IPC Sections 364-A, 302, 120-B, 201/34. Both State and Accused Filed Appeals Against Trial Court Conviction and Sentence, With the Accused Challenging the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence.

The present matter concerns two criminal appeals arising from the judgment and order dated 30.11.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Chain of Circumstances Incomplete Due to Lack of Motive and Weak Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302/201/34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the appellant, Bani Alam Majid, against the judgment of the Gauhati High Court which had affirmed his convicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Not Complete to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 392 read with Section 34 of IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Sawantwadi dated 24 January 1997 acquitting the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, Extortion, and Destruction of Evidence. Conviction based on circumstantial evidence including CDRs, extra-judicial confession, and last seen evidence upheld.

The case involved two appeals before the Bombay High Court against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, convicting the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder, Acquits Others in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC sustained for accused who inflicted fatal injuries, while others acquitted for insufficient proof of common intention.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by convicted accused and a criminal application by the State seeking leave to appeal against acqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence and Criminal Appeal in Case Involving Kidnapping, Unnatural Offence and Murder of a Minor Boy. Trial Court Convicted Accused Under Sections 302, 377, 364 and 367 IPC and Imposed Death Penalty, Which Required Automatic Confirmation by the High Court.

The case originates from a kidnapping and murder of a two-and-half-year-old boy, Golu, who went missing on 14 May 2010 from Surendragarh, Nagpur. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.49 of 2001 for offences under Sec...