Search Results for "departmental enquiry after retirement"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order for Payment of Arrears of Salary to Driver Reinstated After Acquittal in Corruption Case. No Justification for Denying Full Back Wages During Intervening Period of Compulsory Retirement.

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 9 August 2018 in Original Applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Withholding of Pension and Gratuity During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings. State of Bihar's Circulars and Resolution Cannot Override Rule 43(b) of Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 Which Requires a Finding of Guilt Before Withholding Pension.

The appellant, Dr. Hira Lal, was a Touring Veterinary Officer in Bihar who was implicated in the Fodder Scam (RC Case No.48 A/1996) and placed under s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Pension by Syndicate Bank — Violation of Natural Justice and Pension Regulations. Reduction of two-third pension without show cause notice set aside; bank directed to restore full pension and pay arrears.

The petitioner, B. Narayana Rao, was appointed as a Clerk in Syndicate Bank on 22.5.1972 and rose to the position of Senior Manager in Grade Scale-V b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...