Search Results for "deficit court fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "deficit court fee"

283 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 283 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings Upheld Despite Suit Filed on Last Day of Limitation. The court held that delay in filing suit does not bar specific performance if plaintiff is ready and willing, and oral evidence to contradict written agreement is inadmissible under Section 92 of Evidence Act without pleading fraud or mistake.

17 Jul 2026

The appellants, defendants in a suit for specific performance, challenged the concurrent findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court which d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to File Written Statement. Failure to File Written Statement Does Not Automatically Entitle Plaintiff to Judgment Under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Sri Raja R, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 22.02.2022 passed by the X...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Decree for Deficit Court Fee Recovery. Appellants' suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed for failure to pay proper court fee on market value of property.

18 Sep 2025

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of an immovable property. The trial cou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order to Impound Insufficiently Stamped Sale Agreement. Document Insufficiently Stamped Cannot Be Admitted in Evidence Without Payment of Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Under Section 34 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957.

27 Jan 2017

The petitioners, who are plaintiffs in O.S. No.4/2009 pending before the Senior Civil Judge, Lingasugur, filed a suit for specific performance based o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Non-Prosecution and Non-Payment of Court Fees in Copyright Dispute Over Film Script. Plaintiff failed to pay deficit court fee of Rs.2,50,000 and did not prosecute the suit after interim relief was denied.

27 Jan 2016

The plaintiff, Uday Singh Deshraj Rajput, filed Suit (L) No. 967 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court on 11 November 2013 seeking a declaration that he wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Deficit Stamp Duty Demand Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1948 — Conveyance Deed Not Chargeable Under Section 25 as Mortgage Deed. The court held that a deed of conveyance mentioning an existing mortgage does not become a mortgage deed under Section 25 of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1948.

25 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Universal Ferro & Allied Chemicals Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Sub-Lease of Multiplex — Lease Premium Not Part of Consideration for Sub-Lease Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that the expression 'consideration for the sub-lease' in Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 refers only to the consideration moving from the sub-lessee to the sub-lessor, and not the premium paid by the original lessee to the lessor.

9 Jul 2014

The petitioner, CR Retail Malls (India) Limited, challenged an order dated 21 March 2013 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Taxing Master's Order on Court Fees in Property Suit — Court Fees Must Be Paid on Current Market Value Under Section 5 of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959. Plaintiff's Challenge to Order Directing Payment of Court Fees on Current Market Value Dismissed as Consent Decree in Prior Suit Does Not Affect Court Fee Liability in Subsequent Suit.

24 Jul 2013

The plaintiff, Smt. Hema Valecha, filed a Chamber Summons challenging an order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by the learned Taxing Master of the Bombay Hi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.

10 Jun 2010

The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Reduces Enhanced Compensation. Court holds that mere potentiality of land for non-agricultural use does not justify compensation at rates comparable to developed plots without evidence of comparable sales.

10 Feb 2010

The case involves multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for a housing scheme under th...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)