Search Results for "defective application"

1166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband to Withdraw Divorce Petition with Liberty to File Fresh Petition Due to Defective Pleadings. Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC permits withdrawal with liberty if formal defect exists; Family Court's refusal to grant liberty was erroneous.

The petitioner, Neeraj M. Gwalani, filed a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on 16 Februar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay in Filing Caveat in Probate Proceedings — Delay of 140 Days Not Sufficiently Explained. Court Held That Awareness of Proceedings and Legal Advice Negated Claim of Ignorance, and Delay Was Not Condoned Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by the applicants (caveators) seeking condonation of a 140-day delay in filing a caveat and affidavit in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Suits for Recovery of Hire-Purchase Instalments Following Default by Hirer. Dispute Centered on Alleged Defects in Centrifugal Casting Machines and Procedural Objections Including Jurisdiction and Joinder of Parties.

The National Small Industries Corporation Ltd., a Government of India undertaking, filed two suits for recovery of amounts due under two hire-purchase...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Defective Machinery. Claim Barred by Limitation as Arbitration Reference Made Beyond Three Years from Cause of Action Under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, M/s. Premlaxmi & Co., placed an order with respondent No.1, Ingersoll Rand (India) Limited, for purchase of portable compressors. Four ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Summary Suit for Recovery of Money. Order 6 Rule 2(3) CPC does not require dates and sums in figures and words in plaint, and Order 37 Rule 2 CPC does not mandate separate verification.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants (original defendants) against the order dated 07/11/2022 passed by the 14th Joint C...