Search Results for "deceptively similar mark"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "deceptively similar mark"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.

4 May 2026

The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case and Guilty of Iniquitous Conduct. The court upheld the Single Judge's refusal of interim injunction under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Copyright Act, 1957, finding suppression of facts and lack of evidence of ownership.

6 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal was filed by Laser Shaving India Pvt Ltd (the original plaintiff) against the order dated 25/06/2025 passed by the learn...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

6 Jan 2026

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

6 Nov 2025

The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Favor of Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement Suit Over STIMULIV vs STIMULET. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Despite Differences in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Therapeutic Use.

1 Mar 2021

The dispute involves two pharmaceutical companies: Franco Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd (Plaintiff) and Corona Remedies Pvt Ltd (Defendant). The Plai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

11 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'RISO' for Rice Bran Oil Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'RISOLITE' Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

9 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Kamani Oil Industries Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Bhuwaneshwar Refineries Pvt. Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction for trademark in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, and Copyright Infringement Suit — Sopariwala Exports v. Kuber Khaini Private Limited. The court found deceptive similarity between the plaintiffs' registered trademark 'AFZAL' and defendants' label 'KUBER', and restrained defendants from using the impugned label.

9 Aug 2012

The plaintiffs, Sopariwala Exports (a partnership firm) and another company, are engaged in manufacturing and marketing tobacco under the trademark 'A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Use and Passing Off. Marks VIVACITY and VIVZ held not deceptively similar to registered mark VIVA under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

12 Jul 2010

The Plaintiffs, Arviva Industries (India) Ltd., filed a suit seeking an injunction against the Defendants, Vikas M. Tulsian and others, alleging infri...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)