Search Results for "cooperative landowners"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Inquiry Order Against Former Office Bearers of Housing Cooperative Society for Lack of Jurisdiction. Joint Registrar's Order Under Section 64 of Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1965 Set Aside for Failure to Record Satisfaction and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, former office bearers of the National Technological Institutions Housing Cooperative Society Ltd., challenged an order dated 06.04.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Surrendered DP Road Land Despite No-Objection Condition. Transferable Development Rights cannot be denied merely because surrender was a condition of permission; entitlement arises from statutory scheme under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Nirmal Ujwal Credit Cooperative Society, challenged a communication dated 22.09.2014 from the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (Planning A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...