Search Results for "consignee name"

61 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 61 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Dispute Over Encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee After Full Contractual Performance. Arbitration Clause Covers Dispute Despite Completion of Contract and Payment.

The petitioner, M/S Glock Asia-Pacific Ltd., filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cenvat Credit Appeals in Central Excise Case — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Suppression of Facts. Credit Denial Unsustainable When Simultaneously Available to Other Factories Under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002.

The case involves four appeals filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 by M/s. Sanvijay Rolling & Engineering Ltd. and Sanjay P. Agarw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Informer Seeking Balance Reward Under Customs Informers' Reward Scheme. Customs Department Directed to Pay Balance Reward Amount to Informer Who Provided Information Leading to Revenue Collection.

The petitioner, an informer of the Customs Department, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to release the balance amoun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for FEMA Violations in Bogus Export Case — Appellant Director Held Liable for Receiving Remittances Without Actual Exports Under Sections 3(b) and 3(d) of FEMA.

The case involves an appeal under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) against an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreig...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Port Trust for Refusing Remission of Demurrage Charges. Port Trust's Own Guidelines for Remission When Detention by Customs for Bonafide Operations Must Be Followed.

The petitioner, M/s. Rasiklal Kantilal & Co., a partnership firm engaged in import of goods including zinc ingots and copper wire bars, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Export Sale Under Section 5(1) Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 — Sale Completed by Transfer of Documents After Goods Crossed Customs Frontiers. Letter Dated 16/7/1971 Did Not Alter Original Contract Terms; Sale Held in Course of Export.

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Customs Penalty for Signing Documents in Good Faith — Section 112(a) Customs Act, 1962. Petitioner's limited role and lack of knowledge of illegal importation warranted reduction of penalty from Rs.7.5 lakhs to Rs.1 lakh.

The petitioner, Ashok Chhabildas, a sole proprietor of M/s A.V. Impex, challenged the order of CEGAT dated 19/1/2001 which confirmed the order-in-orig...