CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012
29 Jan 2016...
Search Results for "concealing smuggled goods"
26 result(s) found
Found 26 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Supply of Hindi Translation of Documents to Detenu Not Conversant with English. Failure to Provide Translated Copies of Material Documents Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.
17 Oct 2013The petitioner, Pradeep Panchal, son of the detenu Brahmpal Panchal, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated 7 February 2...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.
19 Mar 2015The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Lack of Proximate Link Between In-Custody Offences and Breach of Public Order. Detenu's Criminal Activities While in Custody Cannot Form Basis for Preventive Detention Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act, 1981.
15 Jun 2023The petitioner, father of the detenu Pruthviraj Vilas Aawale, challenged the detention order dated 16 December 2022 passed by the District Magistrate,...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.
25 Apr 2006The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...
- 102
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation — Right Under Article 22(5) Violated. The Court held that the 60-day delay in considering the detenue's representation by the Central Government was unexplained and vitiated the detention order.
15 May 2023The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against a preventive detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activi...
- 227
