Search Results for "company secretary"

3283 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3283 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 305(6) CrPC for Appointment as Company Representative. The court held that the trial court's order doubting the genuineness of resignation was unsustainable and directed fresh consideration.

The petitioner, Krishnaswamy Sridhar, was accused No.4 in Special C.C. No.245/2002 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Demand Notice Issued to Former Director for Recovery of Company's Customs Dues. Director Not Personally Liable for Tax Arrears Under Section 142 of Customs Act, 1962, Absent Statutory Provision.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Purshottam Das Gupta, an 86-year-old former director of Sujata Verbatim Limited (later known as PDG Infotec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka hears a writ petition challenging the assignment of investigation to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office under Section 212 of the Companies Act, 2013. The petition raises issues regarding the permissibility of parallel investigation and violation of natural justice principles.

The petitioner, Exalogic Solutions Private Limited, a one person company incorporated in 2014, sought to quash an order dated 31-01-2024 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Excise Duty Case — Licensee Liable for Duty on Liquor Destroyed in Fire. Absolute liability under Rule 7(11)(a) of UP Bottling of Foreign Liquor Rules, 1969 and Rules 708/709 of UP Excise Manual; act of God no defense.

The case arises from a fire incident on 10.04.2003 at the godown of the respondent company, a distillery licensee, which destroyed 35,642 cases of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Winding Up Order Due to Defective Advertisement Under Rule 99 of Company Court Rules, 1959. Failure to Advertise in Correct Name of Company Violates Mandatory Requirement and Cannot Be Cured by Inherent Powers.

The appeal challenged an order dated 21 June 2018 by which the learned Company Judge allowed Company Petition No. 829 of 2003 filed by SICOM Limited f...