Search Results for "cheque number"

615 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 615 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court partly allowed Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case -- Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Upheld However order for imposition of cost set aside -- Petitioner Challenge to Conviction and Sentence Fails

The High Court dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act -- The petitioner was con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Service of Statutory Notice Valid Despite Unsigned Office Copy. Absence of Signature on Office Copy of Demand Notice Does Not Invalidate Service Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vardhman Steel, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sai Engineering, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act stands unless rebutted by accused; accused failed to rebut presumption of legally enforceable debt.

The appeal was filed by the complainant (appellant) against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Banhatti, in C.C....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; mere denial of signature on cheque not sufficient to rebut presumption.

The appellant, Dharampeth Mahila Urban Credit Cooperative Society Limited (now Dharampeth Mahila Multi State Cooperative Society Limited), filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt Liability. Appellant Society Failed to Establish Loan Agreement and Outstanding Amount Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Dharampeth Mahila Urban Credit Cooperative Society Limited (now Dharampeth Mahila Multi State Cooperative Society Limited), filed a cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Cheque Issued as Security for Time-Barred Debt Does Not Attract Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by Smt. Nasreen Pasha (the accused) against the judgment of the JMFC, Gubbi, in CC No.439/2008 da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complaint Not Maintainable as Notice Was Not Sent to Correct Address.

The petitioner, P. Surendra Kumar, was shown as an accused in a private complaint filed by the respondent, M/s. Varkeys Retail Ventures Pvt. Ltd., all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Accused Failed to Prove Defence That Cheque Was Issued for Different Transaction and Cash Paid.

The complainant, Stanley Barros Pereira, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the accused, Julieta Cot...