Search Results for "bunkers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "bunkers"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Wrongful Arrest of Vessel Case — Duty to Mitigate Under Section 73 Contract Act Does Not Apply to Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The court held that the undertaking under Rule 941 is a contractual obligation independent of the duty to mitigate damages, and the plaintiff must pay damages as per the undertaking without reduction for failure to mitigate.

5 Nov 2014

The case involves an appeal by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A., the owner of the vessel MV Rainbow Ace, against an order of the learned single Judge of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amount in Admiralty Suit — Poundage Calculated on Amount Actually Realized Under Warrant of Arrest, Not on Claim Value.

17 Jan 2014

The plaintiffs, Great Pacific Navigation (Holdings) Corporation Ltd., filed an Admiralty Suit against the vessel M.V. Tongil Yantai and its owners for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel Based on Beneficial Ownership. Court holds that under the International Convention on Arrest of Ships, 1999, a maritime claimant can arrest a vessel beneficially owned by the same person who owns the charterer-debtor, even if the vessel is registered in a different name.

2 Jul 2013

The appellant, Lufeng Shipping Company Ltd., a Chinese company, had a maritime claim of US$ 1,628,658.07 against respondent No.2, Whim Star Chartering...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Vacation of Arrest of Vessel in Maritime Claim — Charterer's Bareboat Charter Terminated Before Arrest, Vessel Not Owned by Charterer at Time of Arrest. The court held that the arrest of vessel Geowave Commander was invalid as the vessel was not owned by the charterer M/s. Reflect and the sister ship provision under the Admiralty Act did not apply.

10 May 2013

The appellant, Yusuf Abdul Gani, sole proprietor of Jumbo Offshore Enterprises, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Priority of Claims Against Sale Proceeds of Arrested Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The court directed that the order of priority of claims against the sale proceeds shall be determined after the expiration of a period specified by the court and that a notice inviting claims be published under Sub-rule 951(3) of the Bombay High Court Rules.

19 Oct 2012

The plaintiff, Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. BOS ANGLER and its owner Bos Angler AS,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Dispute — Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy. Court Refuses to Interfere with Arbitrator's Findings on Demurrage and Hire Charges Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Jun 2011

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award da...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)