Search Results for "bribe demand"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "bribe demand"

307 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Revenue Employee in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proven. Petitioner, an in-charge Sub-Registrar, was accused of demanding illegal gratification for registering a mortgage deed, but the court found no evidence of demand and held that mere suspicion cannot sustain prosecution under Section 7(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Sri P. Manjunath, was an employee of the Revenue Department in the Stamps and Registration wing, holding the substantive post of First...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 161 IPC set aside as sole trap witness was interested and testimony uncorroborated.

16 Aug 2017

The appellant, Shridhar Ramkrushna Fale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Unproven Demand and Doubtful Evidence. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was set aside as the prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, with a tax exemption notice served before the alleged demand rendering it improbable.

21 Feb 2022

The dispute involved an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the appellant, a Commercial Tax Officer, was acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

28 Jul 2015

The appellant, Selvaraj Johnson Rodrigo, was convicted by the Special Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Trustworthy Evidence and Applicable Presumption. The Court Held That Minor Discrepancies in Witness Testimony Do Not Vitiate Prosecution When Core Facts of Demand and Acceptance Are Established Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) Read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

16 Apr 2025

The present criminal appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 09.03.2012 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Dharwad in Crimin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Bribery Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Lapses. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

26 Apr 2012

The appellant, Rajesh Mopkar, a clerk in the Income Tax Office, Nagpur, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for demanding and accepting a brib...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Section 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

11 Aug 2020

The appellant, C. Krishnaiah, was accused no. 2 in a corruption case before the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysore, in Spl. Case No. 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

14 Aug 2018

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

2 Jul 2018

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Chandrabhan Sadavarti, the original appellant, under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe — Conviction under Sections 161, 165 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, and the recovery of tainted money from a third party was insufficient to sustain conviction.

16 Jan 2006

The appellant, Ananda Sukhdeo Gangane, a Talathi (revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Khamgaon for offences under Sections 161 and 1...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)