Search Results for "bootleggers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "bootleggers"

311 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Satisfying Material and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order based on stale and trivial offences fails to establish that the detenu is a 'dangerous person' under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons, etc. Act, 1981.

16 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sharavan @ Rahul Ashok Burungale, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22nd November 2024 passed by the Commissioner of Polic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under M.P.A.D. Act for Lack of Proximity Between Offences and Public Order. Detenu's Criminal Acts Were Against Individuals, Not Society at Large, Failing the Test of 'Public Order' Under Section 2(b-1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

12 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Ganesh Bharat Giri, aged 23, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 11.05.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order Against Alleged Dangerous Person for Lack of Proximate Link Between Offences and Public Order. Detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as the two criminal cases relied upon did not affect public order and were already subject to bail.

2 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Siddhant @ Siddharth Sachin Dhanedar, challenged a detention order dated 19/06/2024 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik City,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates and statements of injured witnesses to detenu vitiates preventive detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981.

6 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammad Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 27 September 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Single Isolated Incident Without Satisfying 'Disturbed Area' Condition Under Section 2(a-1) of MPDA Act.

25 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Siddant alias Siddharth Sanjay Marathe, challenged a detention order dated 7 February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Mechanical Exercise of Power and Non-Application of Mind. Detention order bearing year 2021 passed in 2022 and failure to consider bail conditions vitiates subjective satisfaction under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

3 May 2023

The petitioner, Mujib s/o Abdul Shaikh, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad, under Section 3(2) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Compelling Necessity. Preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was in judicial custody and did not independently verify in-camera statements.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Sandeep Govind Pawar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Placement of Bail Documents. Failure to place bail applications and orders before the Detaining Authority vitiates subjective satisfaction under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drugs Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

25 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Ramesh Dandekar, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the detention order dated 01.12.202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Material to Show Disturbance of Public Order. The court held that preventive detention requires a threat to public order, not mere law and order issues, and that unexplained delay vitiates the order.

29 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Ganesh alias Gajaraj Sainath Patil, challenged a detention order dated 19 January 2021 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Specification of Period — Blanket Order Invalid Under Section 3(2) Proviso. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 mandates specification of detention period in the order, and a blanket order without such specification is invalid.

23 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Sadashiv s/o Shriram Jadhav, challenged the legality and correctness of a detention order dated 18.9.2020 passed by the Collector and ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)