Search Results for "body corporate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "body corporate"

1107 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1107 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Appellants -- Upholds Committee of Creditors' Approval of Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited's Resolution Plan Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 -- Doctrine of Commercial Wisdom Affirmed in Insolvency Resolution

27 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court upheld the approval of a Resolution Plan by Sarda Energy and Minerals Limited (SEML) for SKS Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Ltd. un...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Over Creditor Status and Resolution Plan Approval. Statutory Authority's Claim as Financial or Secured Creditor Rejected Due to Lack of Diligent Action During Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

12 Feb 2024

The dispute arose from the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of M/s. JNC Construction (P) Ltd, the Corporate Debtor. The appellant, a sta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Set-Off Claim in Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that set-off is permissible during CIRP as it promotes efficiency and equity, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not automatically prohibit such adjustments when claims arise from mutual and connected transactions.

3 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court involved a dispute between Bharti Airtel Limited and Bharti Hexacom Limited (Airtel entities) and Aircel Limited a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. in Insolvency Case — Holds That Statutory Charge Under Electricity Supply Agreement Survives Liquidation and Must Be Respected Under IBC. The Court ruled that a charge created under Section 53 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with contractual terms is not extinguished by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the liquidator must treat the appellant as a secured creditor.

1 Jan 2023

The appellant, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (PVVNL), a state electricity distribution company, entered into an electricity supply agreement ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Resolution Professional in IBC Moratorium Dispute. Section 14(1)(d) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 prohibits owner from recovering property occupied by corporate debtor during moratorium, even under joint development agreement.

19 Feb 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the interpretation of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The appellant, Ra...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Admits Appeal Against Order Vacating Ex-Parte Stay on NCLT Proceedings in Corporate Insolvency Case. Company Petition for Winding Up Admitted Prior to IBC Application; Court to Determine Jurisdiction Overlap Between Winding Up and Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.

26 Jul 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

20 Jul 2016

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging the Validity of State Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases. The Petitioners Seek Declaration that the Notification is Ultra Vires the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and the Constitution.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)