Search Results for "bachelor deceased"

214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Tribunal's Deduction of 50% Towards Personal Expenses for Bachelor Deceased Upheld as Per Sarla Verma; Income and Multiplier Assessment Affirmed.

The case pertains to a motor accident claim filed by the parents of the deceased Sureshbhai, who died in a road accident on 16.05.2012. The deceased w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed: Parents Entitled to Compensation Despite Separate Residence Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's decision upheld; parents' right to compensation affirmed even if not fully dependent on the deceased.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal of an insurance company challenging the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in favor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim - Deceased Pan Shop Owner's Income Assessed at Rs.6,000 per Month with Multiplier of 18. Negligence of Driver Established; No Contributory Negligence; Compensation Enhanced to Rs.5,00,000.

The appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 2.1.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Wardha in M.A.C.P. No.49 of 2003. The claiman...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Minor in Motor Accident Case. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Held Liable to Pay Enhanced Compensation with Interest Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of a deceased minor. The accident occurred on 22.06.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Adverse Possession Claim. Appellants failed to prove hostile possession and ouster of co-owners, and concurrent findings of courts below were not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between the appellants (legal heirs of Govind Baboni Gaonkar and Soku Govind Gaonkar) and the respondents (legal ...