Search Results for "arbitral award enforcement"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Arbitration Case Upholding Arbitral Award. Challenge to Tribunal's Constitution Fails as 30-Day Appointment Period in Arbitration Agreement is Directory, Not Mandatory, Under Sections 16, 34, and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The dispute originated from a consultancy agreement dated 18 September 1995 between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) and Respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The court recognized and enforced five foreign arbitral awards, rejecting challenges based on invalidity of arbitration agreement and scope of submission.

The High Court of Bombay adjudicated a commercial arbitration petition filed under Part II of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Remand Authority in Mumbai Slum Redevelopment Dispute. Key Decision on Appellate Powers and Arbitral Award Validity in Complex Multi-Party Case

The Supreme Court is addressing appeals concerning a High Court judgment on a slum redevelopment project in Mumbai. The case involves various parties,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Commercial Appeals Dismissed: Court Upholds Single Judge's Decision Against Draft Supplemental Agreement" "Arbitral award set aside due to non-execution and unenforceability of central document, with significant procedural and substantive flaws identified."

Two concurrent Commercial Appeals (90 of 2020 and 91 of 2020) arising from an arbitral award dated February 14, 2017. The award was set aside by a Sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Enforces Foreign Arbitration Award Amid Allegations of Bias. India reaffirms its commitment to enforcing foreign arbitration awards, dismissing challenges based on bias and public policy.

The Supreme Court of India upheld the Bombay High Court's decision to enforce a foreign arbitration award rendered by the Singapore International Arbi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Petitioner in Iron Ore Fines Sale Dispute. Rejects Respondent's Challenge Based on Public Policy and Natural Justice Under Sections 44-49 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Noble Resources Ltd., a Hong Kong company, entered into a contract on 9 May 2008 with the respondent, Twenty First Century Wire Roads ...