Search Results for "approver statement"

75 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 75 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Accused in Murder Case Challenging Framing of Charges. Trial Court's Order Framing Charges Against Sitting MLA Upheld as No Material Irregularity Found in Prima Facie Case.

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly and former Cabinet Minister, was arrayed as Accused No.15 in a murder case concerning the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows NIA Appeal Under Section 21(1) of NIA Act, 2008 Against Rejection of Tender of Pardon Under Section 306 CrPC — Held That Order Rejecting Pardon Application Is Not Interlocutory and Is Appealable.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed an appeal under Section 21(1) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Granted to Co-Accused in Corruption Case for Non-Compliance with Section 307 CrPC. Pardon Order Set Aside as Special Court Failed to Record Reasons and Did Not Follow Mandatory Procedure Under Section 307 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The applicant, Nanak Waswani (Accused No.1), and non-applicant No.2, Suresh Chichghare (Accused No.2), were facing trial for offences under the Preven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Kidnapping, Gang Rape, and Murder of a 3½-Year-Old Girl. Trial Court Convicted Under Sections 363, 366, 377, 302, 201 Read with 34 IPC Based on Circumstantial Evidence.

The Bombay High Court heard criminal appeals filed by four accused/appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the role of each accused in the homicidal death.

The case involves three criminal appeals and two criminal applications arising from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting the appellants ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...