Search Results for "adult member"

637 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 637 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Cooperative Society Dispute — Revision Under Section 154 of MCS Act Allowed Without Proper Hearing. Minister's order set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and failure to consider relevant material.

The petitioner, Pandurang Tukaram Thakre, claiming to be a member of respondent no. 4 cooperative society, filed a writ petition challenging an order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Addresses Conflicting Precedents on Procedural Mandates for No Confidence Motions Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Reference to Larger Bench Examines Whether Formal Motion and Seconding Requirement Under Rule 17 of Meeting Rules is Mandatory or Directory.

The appeal before the Bombay High Court arose from a no confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Theur, Pune. The appellant, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Gender-Discriminatory Amendment to CPC Service Rule. Bombay Amendment to Order V Rule 15 CPC Held Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional for Restricting Service to Adult Male Members Only.

The case arose from a Letters Patent Appeal where the appellant sought to serve notice on respondent no.5. The bailiff returned the notice unserved be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No Substantial Question of Law Found Under Section 100 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of title and pe...