Search Results for "admissibility ratio"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case Based on Confessional Statements and Recovery of Charas. Statements under Section 67 of NDPS Act, 1985 held admissible and voluntary, and recovery of contraband from house and auto rickshaw established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed the conviction of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Refund of Rs.56 Crore Service Tax Deposit Retained Without Authority of Law. Petitioner Bank's deposit made under protest to buy peace on interchange income cannot be retained without show cause notice or adjudication order.

The petitioner, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the retent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Convictions and Reverses Acquittals in Political Rivalry Murder Case — Witness Testimony and Recoveries Sufficient to Sustain Convictions Under Sections 302, 148, 460 IPC and Section 3 Explosives Substances Act.

The case arises from a political rivalry between CPI(M) and NDF members. On 17.07.2002, an altercation occurred between the deceased (CPI(M)) and A-3 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.

The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Act Suit — Leave and License Agreement Not a Camouflage. Court upholds Small Causes Court's finding that no landlord-tenant relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant under Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Dinesh Vasantrai Bhuta, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Production of Document in Criminal Complaint. Court holds that the document sought was not relevant to the proceedings and the application was filed belatedly.

The petitioner, Manjula Ramlal Barot, filed a criminal complaint against respondents No.1 to 5 for offences under Sections 347, 348, 386, 395, 506(ii)...