Search Results for "Video Infrastructure"

91 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 392 r/w 397 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Madhukara @ Madhu @ Mallesha, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-I, Shimoga in S.C. No. 78/2012 for offences punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Suo Motu Directions to State to Ensure Proper Care for Mentally Deficient Children in Homes. State’s Failure to Implement Juvenile Justice Act Provisions Prompted Mandatory Directions for Streamlined Recognition, Management Committees, and Mental Health Care.

This suo motu Public Interest Litigation was initiated by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on the basis of a newspaper report dated 24 August 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Developer Granted Interim Relief to Take Possession of Tenements from Non-Cooperating Members Pending Arbitration Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, M/s. R.R.B. Realtors Pvt. Ltd., a real estate developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...