Search Results for "Vesting Notification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Vesting Notification"

312 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 312 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Proceedings — Proceedings Deemed Abated Under Repeal Act Due to Non-Completion of Vesting. Landowners' Successors Entitled to Benefit of Section 3 of ULC Repeal Act, 1999 as Physical Possession Not Taken.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioners, Zainulabedin Abdul Razzak Kokni and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging proceedings under the Urba...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

30 Jan 2026

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Mining Company's Challenge to Stoppage Notice Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 — Two-Year Mining Period Expired. Lease Deed Executed on 18.04.2022 Permitted Mining for Maximum Two Years or Till Stage II Approval, Whichever Earlier; Court Held That the Stoppage Notice Was Valid and No Interference Warranted.

18 Feb 2025

The petitioner, M/S Minera Steel and Power Pvt. Ltd., a mining company, challenged a stoppage notice dated 08.04.2024 issued by the Deputy Conservator...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Directs Shifting of Date for Determining Market Value Due to Inordinate Delay. Compensation to be Determined as on Date of Award Instead of Preliminary Notification Under Section 28 of KIAD Act, 1966.

2 Jan 2025

The appellants, Bernard Francis Joseph Vaz and others, purchased residential sites in Gottigere Village, Bengaluru between 1995 and 1997. On 3rd April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Abatement of ULC Proceedings and Non-Vesting of Land Under Repeal Act. Landowner's Surplus Land Declaration Under Sections 8(4), 9, and 10 of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 Held to Have Abated as Physical Possession Not Taken Before Repeal Act Came Into Force.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Smt. Tarabai Tulshiram Meshram, filed a writ petition seeking a declaration that all proceedings under Sections 9 and 10 of the Urban ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging ULC Act Vesting Order — Petitioner's Title Not Extinguished by Surrender of Possession by Third Party. Constituted Attorney of Partners and Owners of Land Successfully Challenges Competent Authority's Order Vesting Land in State under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

21 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Pankaj S. Parikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a declarat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, even if possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance with Section 41(1) Proviso and Lapse of Urban Land Ceiling Proceedings. Acquisition Notification Held Invalid as Land Already Vested in State Under Urban Land Ceiling Act Was Not Available for Acquisition Under MHADA Act.

31 Jan 2012

The case involves a challenge to the acquisition of land bearing Survey No. 113/3 and 115/6 at Solapur under the Maharashtra Housing and Area Developm...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)